Turn fragmented leads into a defensible case record

Public-sector teams are often forced to investigate across browser tabs, point tools, screenshots, analyst notes and disconnected reports. Arqent AIF gives the work a governed case structure so every lead, source, artifact and reviewer decision can stay connected.

Scroll

Product view

A case workflow, not another lookup screen

Signals, files, tool results, analyst notes and reviewer decisions stay attached to the same case from intake to final briefing.

Intake

Leads, files, source requests and case objectives

Collection

OSINT, dark web, internal data and governed Skills

Analysis

Workwalls, entity context, source notes and reviewer checks

Output

Briefing, evidence package and decision trail

CASE TO EVIDENCE FLOW

Every output remains attached to the case

A case workflow, not another lookup screen

What investigation teams get back

Faster first-pass triage

Less lost context

Cleaner review package

Deployment-aware from day one

Where investigation work usually breaks

A lead starts in one system, an OSINT result lands in another, a dark web note is copied into a document, and the final report has to explain why the team trusted the conclusion. That handoff pattern is slow and difficult to defend.

Arqent AIF keeps the work inside a governed case structure. Analysts can collect, enrich, correlate and brief while the system preserves artifacts, reviewer decisions and source context.

01

PROBLEM

Leads spread across tools

Analysts collect signals from OSINT, dark web, files and internal sources, but the investigation record becomes scattered.

02

WORKFLOW FIX

Context gets lost

Each lead, enrichment step, workwall relation, report draft and reviewer note stays attached to the case.

03

OUTCOME

Outputs must stand up to review

The end product is an evidence package with preserved artifacts, source notes and decision trail.

04

CONSTRAINT

Deployment boundaries vary

Sensitive teams can evaluate cloud, government cloud, on-prem, airgapped or edge assumptions before rollout.

Use cases

Government investigation workflows this supports

The same case model can support multiple investigative patterns while preserving evidence, access control and reviewer accountability.

Investigations

Case-native investigations

A team must connect OSINT, files, agent activity, evidence, reports and reviewer decisions without spreading the investigation across chats, spreadsheets and point tools.

Explore workflow

Industries

Government InvestigationsCorporate Security

Capabilities

CasesEvidence StorageWorkwallsAgentic Runtime

Outputs

Case briefingEvidence packageDecision trail

Threat Intel

Darknet marketplace mapping

Analysts need to map marketplaces, onion relations, vendors, indicators and actor context while keeping collection governed and defensible.

Explore workflow

Industries

Corporate SecurityGovernment Investigations

Capabilities

Darknet SearchCustom NodesOntologyWorkwall Graph

Outputs

Relation graphEvidence artifactsThreat package

OSINT

Account identity investigations

Username and account signals need false-positive control, taxonomy, source notes and graph context before they become intelligence.

Explore workflow

Industries

Government InvestigationsCorporate Security

Capabilities

Username PresenceMaigretHoleheWorkwalls

Outputs

Identity graphReviewed hitsEvidence notes

Field Ops

Airgapped and edge intelligence

Teams need local analysis and governed AI where cloud access is constrained, unavailable or not acceptable for the mission.

Explore workflow

Industries

Government InvestigationsCritical Infrastructure

Capabilities

Local AIAirgapEdge DeploymentEvidence Storage

Outputs

Local reportsControlled sync pathAudit package

Product view

Turn findings into connected case context

People, accounts, domains, wallets, locations, reports and source artifacts can be organized into a reviewable workwall instead of remaining isolated lookup results.

Entities

Actors, accounts, domains, wallets and locations

Artifacts

Files, screenshots, tool outputs and reports

Relations

Why one finding matters to another

Review

What was checked, approved and exported

WORKWALL AND ONTOLOGY

Findings become graph context

Turn findings into connected case context

Trust model

Built for review-sensitive investigation work

Government investigation teams need control over sources, evidence, people and deployment boundaries. These are product-design concerns, not afterthoughts.

Source handling

Separate sensitive source workflows by case, role and policy.

  • OSINT context
  • Dark web governance
  • Internal source boundaries

Evidence continuity

Keep outputs attached to the case instead of transient chat or local notes.

  • Artifacts
  • Toolcall replay
  • Report persistence

Reviewer accountability

Make analyst and reviewer decisions visible before outputs leave the workflow.

  • Human approval
  • Decision trail
  • Export context

Deployment boundary

Evaluate hosting and connectivity assumptions before rollout.

  • Government cloud
  • On-prem
  • Airgapped and edge patterns

Map your investigation workflow

We can map intake, sources, review steps, evidence exports and deployment constraints.