Turn fragmented leads into a defensible case record
Public-sector teams are often forced to investigate across browser tabs, point tools, screenshots, analyst notes and disconnected reports. Arqent AIF gives the work a governed case structure so every lead, source, artifact and reviewer decision can stay connected.
Product view
A case workflow, not another lookup screen
Signals, files, tool results, analyst notes and reviewer decisions stay attached to the same case from intake to final briefing.
Intake
Leads, files, source requests and case objectives
Collection
OSINT, dark web, internal data and governed Skills
Analysis
Workwalls, entity context, source notes and reviewer checks
Output
Briefing, evidence package and decision trail
CASE TO EVIDENCE FLOW
Every output remains attached to the case

What investigation teams get back
Faster first-pass triage
Less lost context
Cleaner review package
Deployment-aware from day one
Where investigation work usually breaks
A lead starts in one system, an OSINT result lands in another, a dark web note is copied into a document, and the final report has to explain why the team trusted the conclusion. That handoff pattern is slow and difficult to defend.
Arqent AIF keeps the work inside a governed case structure. Analysts can collect, enrich, correlate and brief while the system preserves artifacts, reviewer decisions and source context.
PROBLEM
Leads spread across tools
Analysts collect signals from OSINT, dark web, files and internal sources, but the investigation record becomes scattered.
WORKFLOW FIX
Context gets lost
Each lead, enrichment step, workwall relation, report draft and reviewer note stays attached to the case.
OUTCOME
Outputs must stand up to review
The end product is an evidence package with preserved artifacts, source notes and decision trail.
CONSTRAINT
Deployment boundaries vary
Sensitive teams can evaluate cloud, government cloud, on-prem, airgapped or edge assumptions before rollout.
Use cases
Government investigation workflows this supports
The same case model can support multiple investigative patterns while preserving evidence, access control and reviewer accountability.
Investigations
Case-native investigations
A team must connect OSINT, files, agent activity, evidence, reports and reviewer decisions without spreading the investigation across chats, spreadsheets and point tools.
Explore workflowIndustries
Capabilities
Outputs
Threat Intel
Darknet marketplace mapping
Analysts need to map marketplaces, onion relations, vendors, indicators and actor context while keeping collection governed and defensible.
Explore workflowIndustries
Capabilities
Outputs
OSINT
Account identity investigations
Username and account signals need false-positive control, taxonomy, source notes and graph context before they become intelligence.
Explore workflowIndustries
Capabilities
Outputs
Field Ops
Airgapped and edge intelligence
Teams need local analysis and governed AI where cloud access is constrained, unavailable or not acceptable for the mission.
Explore workflowIndustries
Capabilities
Outputs
Product view
Turn findings into connected case context
People, accounts, domains, wallets, locations, reports and source artifacts can be organized into a reviewable workwall instead of remaining isolated lookup results.
Entities
Actors, accounts, domains, wallets and locations
Artifacts
Files, screenshots, tool outputs and reports
Relations
Why one finding matters to another
Review
What was checked, approved and exported
WORKWALL AND ONTOLOGY
Findings become graph context

Trust model
Built for review-sensitive investigation work
Government investigation teams need control over sources, evidence, people and deployment boundaries. These are product-design concerns, not afterthoughts.
Source handling
Separate sensitive source workflows by case, role and policy.
- OSINT context
- Dark web governance
- Internal source boundaries
Evidence continuity
Keep outputs attached to the case instead of transient chat or local notes.
- Artifacts
- Toolcall replay
- Report persistence
Reviewer accountability
Make analyst and reviewer decisions visible before outputs leave the workflow.
- Human approval
- Decision trail
- Export context
Deployment boundary
Evaluate hosting and connectivity assumptions before rollout.
- Government cloud
- On-prem
- Airgapped and edge patterns
Map your investigation workflow
We can map intake, sources, review steps, evidence exports and deployment constraints.