Controlled AI. Real results.

Give protection teams risk context before movement starts

Protection work depends on timely context, but raw public signals are noisy. Teams need to know what changed around a person, place, event or actor and how confident the assessment is before they adjust plans.

Human approvalSources attachedAirgapped ready

Product view

Organize risk context around people, places and events

Protective intelligence teams can connect public signals, locations, events, actors and source notes into a reviewable operating picture before movement begins.

People

Protected persons, staff, actors and accounts

Places

Venues, routes, facilities and public locations

Events

Travel, appearances, incidents and schedule changes

Briefings

Risk context, confidence and review notes

CASE GRAPH

Findings become connected context

Organize risk context around people, places and events

What protection teams get back

Faster preparation

Collect and structure relevant signals around the person, place or event the team needs to brief.

Cleaner risk context

Separate relevant relations from raw public noise with source notes and confidence context.

Concise briefings

Produce reviewable outputs for planning, movement and leadership updates.

Controlled claims

Preserve uncertainty and reviewer judgment instead of presenting unsupported predictions.

Where protective intelligence usually breaks

Protection teams need timely context, but the signal stream is noisy: public posts, places, events, mentions and actor references rarely arrive in a useful operational shape.

Arqent structures that work around people, locations and events. Analysts can connect signals, preserve source notes, review confidence and brief the team without turning raw noise into unsupported certainty.

PROBLEM

Signals are noisy

Public posts, locations, events and actor references rarely arrive in a clean protective-intelligence format.

WORKFLOW FIX

Context must be organized quickly

Protected persons, assets, locations, events, source notes and case graph relations are structured around the operation.

OUTCOME

Teams need concise outputs

The workflow produces reviewable protective intelligence outputs for planning, movement and leadership updates.

CONSTRAINT

Certainty cannot be invented

Assessments show relations and source notes – without implying certainty that does not exist.

Use cases

Executive protection workflows this supports

Use connected context for movement planning, situational awareness and protective monitoring.

OSINT

OSINT analysis

Operators collect and assess open sources – usernames, email registrations, domains, social and messaging channels including Telegram, and commercial OSINT such as Fivecast ONYX. Every hit gets a source note and a false-positive check before it becomes a finding.

Explore workflow

Systems and sources

Fivecast ONYXUsername and email checksTelegramWeb and domain sources

What the operator does

Collection under policyFalse-positive controlAssessment with confidence

Results

OSINT assessmentReviewed hitsSource notes

OSINT

Account and identity investigations

Username and account signals across platforms are compared, false positives are marked, and the remaining hits are connected into an identity graph with source notes.

Explore workflow

Systems and sources

Username searchEmail registrations

What the operator does

Cross-platform comparisonFalse-positive reviewIdentity graph

Results

Identity graphReviewed hitsEvidence notes

Critical infrastructure

Situational awareness for critical sites

Global events, natural hazards and incidents appear on one live map next to your sites. Geofences with NATO symbology (APP-6) mark what matters, and operators report what changed and what it affects.

Explore workflow

Systems and sources

Global event feedsHazard dataYour sites

What the operator does

Live mapGeofencesChange reports

Results

Situation briefAffected sitesDecision log

Protection of sites and events

Drone and radio detection

Connected sensors pick up drone Remote ID, aircraft ADS-B, Bluetooth and radio signals. Detections appear on a live map, flights can be tracked, and operators flag what needs attention.

Discuss this use case

Systems and sources

Remote IDADS-BBluetooth and radio sensors

What the operator does

Live detection mapFlight trackingAlerting

Results

Detection logTrack historyIncident report

Monitoring

Continuous monitoring

Operators watch targets, topics and sources on a schedule – day and night – and report only what changed, with the evidence attached. Repeated failures escalate to a person.

Discuss this use case

Systems and sources

OSINT sourcesDarknetEvent feeds

What the operator does

Scheduled runsChange detectionEscalation

Results

Change reportsAlertsWatch history

Protective intelligence

Protection incident review

A concerning mention, event change or incident report goes into a case: sources are reviewed, the escalation is prepared and every decision is recorded.

Discuss this use case

Systems and sources

Mentions and reportsEvent data

What the operator does

Source reviewEscalation preparationDecision log

Results

Incident timelineBriefing packageDecision trail

Travel security

Venue and movement preparation

A route, venue or public appearance gets location context, actor references, open questions and a clear owner for the briefing.

Discuss this use case

Systems and sources

LocationsEventsPublic sources

What the operator does

Location contextActor referencesTask ownership

Results

Route and venue briefOpen questionsAction log

Product view

Keep every briefing tied to the source trail

Signals, notes, reviewer decisions and final briefings remain attached to the operation so teams can understand what changed and why it mattered.

Trigger

Movement, event, mention, report or location change

Assessment

Source review, relation mapping and confidence notes

Decision

Escalate, monitor, brief or dismiss

Output

Protective intelligence briefing with context

EVIDENCE TRAIL

Every result stays linked to its sources

Keep every briefing tied to the source trail

Trust model

Built for careful protective assessments

Protective intelligence workflows must support speed without inventing certainty or exposing sensitive context too broadly.

Source discipline

Keep raw public signals and analyst interpretation distinct.

  • Source notes
  • Confidence context
  • Open questions

Operational boundaries

Limit sensitive person, route and location context by role.

  • Role access
  • Case boundary
  • Need-to-know sharing

Review path

Make briefings accountable before they affect protection plans.

  • Human review
  • Decision trail
  • Briefing context

Deployment fit

Run where the protection mission requires.

  • On-premises
  • Airgapped
  • Role-based sharing

Map a protective intelligence workflow

Define assets, locations, signal sources, review rules and output requirements.