Controlled AI. Real results.
Build a shared picture before incidents become noise
Critical infrastructure teams do not need another wall of indicators. They need to understand what changed, which assets or locations are affected, what evidence supports the update and which decision was made under pressure.
Product view
One operating picture across assets, signals and decisions
Arqent helps operations teams connect weak signals, facility context, incident notes and reviewer decisions before the situation becomes a pile of disconnected alerts.
Assets
Facilities, locations, systems and dependencies
Signals
Cyber, physical, OSINT and operational context
Incidents
What changed, what matters and who reviewed it
Briefings
Situation updates with evidence and decision history
DEPLOYMENT
Same platform, your data boundary

What critical infrastructure teams get back
Less signal noise
Prioritize changes by asset, location, dependency and operational relevance instead of raw indicator volume.
Shared situational context
Give operations, security and leadership the same connected view of assets, incidents and open questions.
Reviewable decisions
Keep analyst notes, source context, briefings and decisions attached to the event record.
Deployment fit
Run on-premises or fully airgapped in isolated networks, with controlled data transfer.
Where operational awareness usually breaks
Infrastructure teams often receive signals from cyber tools, physical security systems, site reports, open sources and partner feeds. The hard part is not seeing more alerts. It is understanding what changed, which assets are affected and what action was taken.
Arqent gives that work a governed operating layer. Signals can be routed into context, connected to assets and locations, reviewed by humans and turned into a concise situation brief with a decision trail.
PROBLEM
Signals arrive without context
Cyber, physical, open-source and operational signals are hard to prioritize when they are not connected to assets and dependencies.
WORKFLOW FIX
Operators need impact, not volume
Facilities, locations, incidents, entities and analyst notes are modeled as connected operational context.
OUTCOME
Updates need a decision trail
Teams can produce situation briefs, asset context and decision logs instead of screenshots and ad hoc updates.
CONSTRAINT
Infrastructure environments are constrained
Deployment planning accounts for hosting, network, data and synchronization limits from the start.
Use cases
Critical infrastructure workflows this supports
Start with the operating picture, then use the same governed case model for awareness, monitoring and reviewable incident response.
Critical infrastructure
Situational awareness for critical sites
Global events, natural hazards and incidents appear on one live map next to your sites. Geofences with NATO symbology (APP-6) mark what matters, and operators report what changed and what it affects.
Explore workflowSystems and sources
What the operator does
Results
Protection of sites and events
Drone and radio detection
Connected sensors pick up drone Remote ID, aircraft ADS-B, Bluetooth and radio signals. Detections appear on a live map, flights can be tracked, and operators flag what needs attention.
Discuss this use caseSystems and sources
What the operator does
Results
Monitoring
Continuous monitoring
Operators watch targets, topics and sources on a schedule – day and night – and report only what changed, with the evidence attached. Repeated failures escalate to a person.
Discuss this use caseSystems and sources
What the operator does
Results
Classified environments
Airgapped intelligence
The full platform runs without any connection to the outside – with local models, local evidence storage and the same checks and approvals as everywhere else.
Explore workflowSystems and sources
What the operator does
Results
Product view
Connect incidents to the infrastructure they affect
Facilities, systems, locations, people, vendors, indicators and incident notes can become connected context instead of separate dashboards and status documents.
Facilities
Sites, zones, systems and dependencies
Events
Alerts, reports, requests and incident notes
Relations
Why a signal matters to a specific operation
Actions
Decision log, briefing and follow-up ownership
CASE GRAPH
Findings become connected context

Trust model
Built for constrained operating environments
Critical infrastructure programs need practical control over access, evidence, deployment topology and escalation paths.
Operational boundaries
Map who can see sites, signals, incidents and decision records.
- Role boundaries
- Site-level context
- Controlled sharing
Evidence continuity
Preserve the source context behind briefings and escalations.
- Signal provenance
- Incident notes
- Briefing artifacts
Human escalation
Keep critical decisions visible and reviewable under pressure.
- Analyst review
- Leadership brief
- Decision log
Deployment constraints
Fit the workflow to the network and data boundary the mission requires.
- On-premises
- Airgapped
- Isolated networks
Map an operational awareness workflow
Start with assets, signals, incidents, required outputs and deployment boundaries.