Controlled AI. Real results.

Turn tool sprawl into repeatable intelligence work

Most corporate security teams do not lack tools. They lack a controlled operating layer that chooses the right tool, captures what it found and turns the result into a case, intelligence package or decision record.

Human approvalSources attachedAirgapped ready

Product view

Put governance around the tools analysts already use

Arqent turns vendors, APIs, MCP servers and internal services into governed tools so every run has policy, context and evidence attached.

Request

Threat, account, domain, dark web or source task

Policy

Who can run which tool for which case

Execution

Logged tool calls, outputs and approval gates

Decision

Briefing, case graph update or case artifact

TOOL GOVERNANCE

Every tool call passes a policy first

Put governance around the tools analysts already use

What security teams get back

Less vendor jumping

Route work across approved tools without forcing analysts to rebuild context in every portal.

Governed tool use

Apply role, case, source and policy checks before sensitive capabilities execute.

Evidence-backed outputs

Keep findings, source notes, tool results and analyst decisions attached to the work product.

Repeatable workflows

Turn recurring threat intelligence and corporate security tasks into controlled operational patterns.

Where corporate security work usually breaks

Corporate security teams already have sources, vendors and internal context. The friction is moving between them while preserving what was checked, why it mattered and who approved the output.

Arqent provides an operating layer around that toolchain. Analysts can request capabilities through policy, collect results into a case, correlate findings in the case graph and brief leadership without losing the evidence trail.

PROBLEM

Analysts jump between vendors

Useful findings remain trapped in separate portals, exports, chats and local notes.

WORKFLOW FIX

Tools need governance

Approved services, MCP servers, APIs and internal tools can be exposed as governed tools with logging and policy checks.

OUTCOME

Findings need to become decisions

The output is a concise, evidence-backed intelligence package, case graph or case update that leadership can review.

CONSTRAINT

Sensitive sources need handling discipline

Dark web, OSINT and internal data workflows can be separated by policy, role and case boundary.

Use cases

Corporate security workflows this supports

Use the same governed toolchain for investigations, dark web context, identity signals and external orchestration.

Investigations

Case-native investigations

From the first lead to the final briefing, operators collect, enrich and correlate inside the case. Sources, findings, analyst decisions and reports stay in one record instead of chats, spreadsheets and point tools.

Explore workflow

Systems and sources

Case fileOSINT sourcesInternal data

What the operator does

Collection and enrichmentCorrelation in the case graphAnalyst review

Results

Case briefingEvidence packageDecision trail

OSINT

OSINT analysis

Operators collect and assess open sources – usernames, email registrations, domains, social and messaging channels including Telegram, and commercial OSINT such as Fivecast ONYX. Every hit gets a source note and a false-positive check before it becomes a finding.

Explore workflow

Systems and sources

Fivecast ONYXUsername and email checksTelegramWeb and domain sources

What the operator does

Collection under policyFalse-positive controlAssessment with confidence

Results

OSINT assessmentReviewed hitsSource notes

Threat intelligence

Darknet intelligence

Find and map onion services, marketplaces, vendors and indicators – with darknet search, an isolated Tor browser and analysis of the Tor relay network. Collection stays governed, and every artifact stays attached to the case.

Explore workflow

Systems and sources

Darknet searchIsolated Tor browserTor relay data

What the operator does

Onion discoveryMarketplace and vendor mappingRelay and operator analysis

Results

Relation graphEvidence artifactsThreat package

Financial crime and compliance

Sanctions screening

Persons, organisations, vessels and aircraft are screened against sanctions lists. Matches, list entries and the reviewer decision are documented in the case.

Discuss this use case

Systems and sources

Sanctions listsCase data

What the operator does

Entity matchingHit reviewDecision log

Results

Screening reportDocumented decisionAudit trail

Fraud and DFIR

Email forensics and BEC

A suspicious email is analysed – headers, domains, links and attachments – enriched, correlated with the case and turned into a report a reviewer can stand behind.

Explore workflow

Systems and sources

EML filesDomain intelligence

What the operator does

Header and link analysisIndicator enrichmentCorrelation

Results

Forensic findingsLinked indicatorsReviewable report

OSINT

Account and identity investigations

Username and account signals across platforms are compared, false positives are marked, and the remaining hits are connected into an identity graph with source notes.

Explore workflow

Systems and sources

Username searchEmail registrations

What the operator does

Cross-platform comparisonFalse-positive reviewIdentity graph

Results

Identity graphReviewed hitsEvidence notes

Monitoring

Continuous monitoring

Operators watch targets, topics and sources on a schedule – day and night – and report only what changed, with the evidence attached. Repeated failures escalate to a person.

Discuss this use case

Systems and sources

OSINT sourcesDarknetEvent feeds

What the operator does

Scheduled runsChange detectionEscalation

Results

Change reportsAlertsWatch history

Platform teams

External tool orchestration

Your team already owns tools and data sources. Arqent wraps them as governed tools: a policy check before every call, a full execution history and results that land in the case.

Explore workflow

Systems and sources

Your tools and APIsMCP servers

What the operator does

Policy check per callExecution historyPackaged workflows

Results

Governed workflowTool call historyPackaged solution

Product view

Turn findings into a shared threat context

Accounts, domains, vendors, actors, source artifacts and internal notes can be connected into a case graph instead of staying isolated in reports and tabs.

Entities

Accounts, domains, actors, vendors and assets

Sources

Dark web, OSINT, internal data and partner feeds

Relations

Why one finding changes another assessment

Outputs

Leadership briefings and evidence-backed case updates

CASE GRAPH

Findings become connected context